CASE STUDY OF AARUSHI TALWAR

Rajesh’s former colleagues Rajiv Kumar Varshney and Rohit Kochhar later told the police that they saw bloodstains on the terrace door, its lock and the staircase leading to the terrace. Rajkumar confirms revenge was motive”. The hospital’s medico-legal register, which contained the information about Aarushi’s sample, went missing in Rajesh Talwar and his terrace were seen by other persons also. As per the statement of doctors who conducted postmortem, the injuries to the neck of both the victims were caused by small and sharp weapon by a surgically trained person in a precise manner. However, Rajesh denied any knowledge about such a call.

Rajiv Kumar and Dr. After Bharati rang the doorbell a third time, Nupur opened the innermost wooden door. Nupur Talwar, individually, in the commission of crime. The couple approaches the Supreme Court. The call records showed that it had not been switched off even once during 60 days preceding the murder.

In Maythe forensic scientists stated that Aarushi was first assaulted with “a heavy sharp-edged weapon”. The second CBI team returned to the “surgical instrument” theory.

The school bag of Aarushi is seen lying near her body without any blood on it. During 23—26 June, Rajkumar was subjected to polygraph test, psychological assessment, brain mapping and narco analysis at FSL, Gandhinagar. atudy

case study of aarushi talwar

The UP Police during their investigation had suspected Dr. The question whether this key was that of Nupur or Hemraj was initially relevant to the investigation, as there were reports that the middle grill door had been locked stjdy outside with a key If both the keys were inside and CBI was right, it could mean that the parents locked the door, then went inside their apartment through Hemraj’s door which they locked from inside, in order to mislead the investigators.

  MONGODB HOMEWORK 4.2 ANSWERS 2015

Rajesh Talwar to the terrace.

What is the Aarushi Talwar murder case? | What Is News, The Indian Express

Rajesh Talwar is identical to the dimensions of the injury found on both the victims. Aarhshi close friend of Aarushi named Anmol had rang the landline of Dr. Nupur Talwar then took the camera to Aarushi’s toom and handed over the camera to Aarushi. On 16 Maythe family’s housemaid Bharati Mandal 35 rang their doorbell around 6 am. What the CBI found, and what it could not”. The doctors who conducted the post mortem have stated the cuts to the neck of both the victims were caused by a small sharp instrument with surgical precision and by a surgically trained person.

The golf set taken over from Rajesh Talwar was sent to experts.

This section could only be applied if CBI would have proved the case beyond reasonable doubts. He saw Aarushi and Hemraj in an objectionable position on Aarushi’s bed. The blunt injury was on Aarushi’s forehead, above the left eye. Investigation relating taldar post mortem of Aarushi and Hemraj revealed the following facts: According to their post-mortem reports, both Aarushi and Hemraj died between 12 am and 1 am.

The police suspected that Rajesh had murdered the two after finding them in an “objectionable” position, or because Rajesh’s alleged extra-marital affair had led to his blackmail by Hemraj and a confrontation with Aarushi.

However, police had no material or forensic evidence to prove it. The key to this room used to be kept under the pillow of Dr. Mega project is superficial answer to drainage congestion, flood management What is fashion doing in a museum? The whitish discharge sample was sent for pathological examination at the local district hospital, which reported tawar of semen.

  HOMEWORK HAWK LEVEL D UNIT 8

Crucial cell phone links”. The scene of crime was inspected by the Investigating Officer on By this time one or two neighbours had come to the flat.

case study of aarushi talwar

A circular marks of wetness is visible below the pelvic area of the body of Aarushi of Aarushi on the bed sheet. Rohit Kochhar later testified that when a policeman asked Rajesh for the terrace key, he “went into the house and did not come out for a long time.

The CBI during its investigations looked into three possible angles relating to the crime in detail: CBI says no cover-up”.

What is the Aarushi Talwar murder case?

Ergothe case cleared many loopholes and problems in the legal system that need to be corrected for speedy and fair trial so that injustice is not done to any other person as done in this case. There was no sign of forced entry in Aarushi’s room.

Apart from the reasons that had made the parents the prime suspects earlier, the new CBI team came up oc some additional points. The parents opposed the closure report, calling CBI’s suspicion on Rajesh as baseless.